EKRAI for R&D & Product Management

Give your engineers back the time to innovate.

Engineering “cannibalizes” documentation time: 95% goes to new products, 5% to documenting. It is unavoidable — which is why the “R&D should document better” approach always fails. EKRAI solves the knowledge bottleneck another way: instant answers at the frontline, and for R&D only deep work, no phone calls.

Protected deep workMissing Data AlertAsynchronous Knowledge TasksReuse of past projectsBOM analysis
Pain & Gain

From an interrupted team to an innovation engine

Today's pain

  • R&D and PM constantly interrupted by Sales, back office and After-Sales
  • R&D sees these requests as a huge waste of time — and it is right
  • 95% of time on new products, 5% on documentation: the gap grows
  • Past projects get lost: you re-design what already exists
  • Delays = risk of losing market opportunities

The gain with EKRAI

  • The frontline finds the answer on its own in 80% of cases
  • Gaps become Missing Data Alerts and asynchronous Knowledge Tasks
  • The calendar returns to deep work, with a slot for map updates
  • Past-project details found in seconds, systematic reuse
  • Freed time goes back to creation and innovation
The technology piece that makes the difference

The Enterprise Knowledge Map: documenting more isn't the answer, mapping is

The map organizes company intelligence around the logic of those who use information, not those who create it. Features, products, versions and documents linked on the Structured Knowledge Base — the Single Source of Truth — and queryable with maximum precision.

🗺️

Knowledge mapped, not piled up

Line → Category → Product → Version → Feature: every document anchored to the right point. “Does product C support feature 3.2?” is answered by the map, not by a lucky search.

🔔

Missing Data Alert → Knowledge Task

If an answer is incomplete or absent, an alert fires and becomes an asynchronous, tracked Knowledge Task with a change log. Bottom-up, not imposed from above: that is why it works where “document better” fails.

⛏️

Re-power of existing knowledge

The “sieve” of Prompt Engineering and semantic structuring separates signal from noise: noise is dropped, knowledge stays structured and reusable. Even for complex analyses like bills of materials (BOM).

Why we are different

Technical knowledge is the hardest case — and the most rewarding

Variants, versions, compatibility, exceptions: the ground where generic prompts know nothing and RAG on raw documents confuses revisions and models. EKRAI's KAG works on knowledge already disambiguated by the map: maximum signal-to-noise, hallucinations trending to zero by progressive convergence. It is in knowledge-intensive processes like R&D that you reach a 70–90% productivity gain.

0%
requests from Sales/Service solved without interrupting R&D
-0%
time searching information on past projects
+0%
time returned to value-adding design work
0%
knowledge gaps tracked as Knowledge Tasks
KPIs to measure in your R&D project
Weekly interruptions per person · response time to internal requests · reuse rate of existing solutions · Knowledge Tasks opened/closed · share of complete answers (growing) · time spent on innovation.
FAQ

FAQ

Do I have to force R&D to document more?
No, and that's the point: the virtuous cycle is bottom-up. You document only what the market actually asked for, when and where it's needed — so productivity grows without fighting the 95%/5%.
What happens when information is missing?
A Missing Data Alert fires and becomes an asynchronous, tracked Knowledge Task: R&D and PM close it in their own time, with no urgent interruptions.

How many engineering hours are you losing to searches and interruptions?

Let's build the map together: we start from your org chart, find the knowledge flows blocking R&D and estimate the recoverable productivity potential.